What happens when an insurance policy includes two conflicting endorsements, one of which grants coverage but the other purports to take away or limit that same coverage? In their article for Law360, Partner Shaun Crosner and Senior Managing Associate Tae Andrews examine the court’s analysis in Penn-America Insurance Co. v. VE Shadowood LP, which provides guidance to insureds trying to make sense of conflicting endorsements in their policies.

 Read the full article here.